Changes in artists’ attitudes may or may not influence the course of the economy of the arts. But societal developments affecting the sacredness of art are bound to affect the economy.

three interrelated developments that may contribute to a demystification of the arts and therefore to a less exceptional economy, such as:
a Rationalization: As society becomes more and more rational, the arts will gradually go through a process of demystification.
b Fading borders: Because the high status of art depends on borders and because borders in our postmodern society have lost much of their significance, the status of art is bound to experience some shrinkage.
c Technical developments: The growing importance of technically reproduced artwork, of mass-produced artwork, and of media culture will further contribute to the demystification of art.

Rationalization, fading borders, and technological developments are not autonomous influences that can be examined divorced from their context. The three are interdependent. After quite some delay and from quite a distance back, art could follow the general trend towards rationalization and still end up representing a counter force.

Both art and science have a cognitive and an emotional dimension. The same applies to the civilizing process. Emotions remain important in a regulated and sublimated way. Art contributes to sublimation and thus to rationalization as well. Art, regulated and secularized, plays a vital role in the civilizing process. More about emotions and art with its process you could found in certain paper and essay, some using help to Write my paper for better grammar and resources.

Artists use illusions to uncover truths about themselves and the world around them. Through illusions, art exposes reality and discovers ‘truth’. This is the kind of cognition Nelson Goodman talks about. Both art and science contribute to cognition; they, in fact, compliment one another. Science also employs illusions a graph is not what it represents but it uses illusions in a formal and hardly a ‘magical’ way.